mastery of a process

There is one thing to be said about the Japanese culture of design, code, etc etc…. “Kaizen” (kigh – zane) – it is generally interpret as striving for perfection. This process of striving for perfection, or continuous improvement and achieving a level of fine art to the process is the whole philosophy of Kaizen.

just like the video below is describing two symbolic acts that sums this Japanese philosophy. It is important to understand that the modern western way of perfection is no longer what we assume as “perfection”. Americans consider an office job or high paying salary as a form of perfection, but what is ‘it’ that is ‘perfection’ – business deals, lawyering, accountant, broker?????

And this bothers me as a whole. We -western minds- would consider the two videos as an expression of a culture – the Japanese way.Except growing up in an Amish community near by, they had this mental too. All the immigrants that came to America and starting a trade in new york (the garment/fashion industry – which is described in the third video) they all took pride in their skills.

Even in the writings of Malcolm Gladwells’ book Outlier – he researched about this perfection or ‘great mind’ having to do ten years or in his words 10,000 hours to be come a talent or gifted in that skill, mind-capabilities, etc. Even software programmers need thousands of hours to get to the point of understanding the material they are working – a form of a mastery.

These videos represent a uni-skill or process to one specific need. One skill to perfection, but today’s 21st cent we are all about collecting multiple skills. Are we even good at these skills? Does a designer needs to be a business man, a politician, a conspirator, a non-profiter, a service diplomat, a fortune teller, a sales man, an engineer, an artist, a philosopher, a writer, a carpenter, a mathematician - a 21st renaissance man???

Should designers take pride that they, as i call myself, a dabbler of skills???? In this economy i need this ‘dabbli-ation’ to survive, but on the flip side, i feel i am not contributing myself an identity towards one perfect skill. A skill that people will admire and to call for that tiny specific problem. Which is the dynamic stress of today, citizens are not aware about their needs or knowing when to call.

It is also the problem to understand  how much will that need of this perfect skill come into existence. This explains why we can still see the “simpler” trades being continue into the art of perfection – ironing, shoe shining, tailoring – these are needs that will never change throughout the decades of technology immersion and such. Except everyone DOES know a person will do the job better than technology – only we will admit that technology provides an “as-good” for a cheaper price.

Lessons from a Tailor. Directed by Galen Summer from Ed David on Vimeo.

lessons from a tailor.

i like receiving simple human lessons like this video.

Lessons from a Tailor. Directed by Galen Summer from Ed David on Vimeo.

is stupid the next innovation?

I don’t know. personally I really think to be innovative is to being stupid at times. Not trying to think but letting it happen and observe the errors of your actions. Planning can get you so far. Good planning requires the data you have collected from past projects and industry measures. Innovation is not about planning. To be innovative is to being watchful of what you are doing and why you are doing it. SO in theory, smart people should watch the stupid people based from the advertisement of diesel’s Just be stupid campaign.

Over all i love it, but also it has truth to what we are experiencing today in this world. Getting the top grades or into the top school does not cut it anymore. Getting a degree in one area does not mean you are working at a job relating to your degree. I see many countless designers not getting the “stereotypical” design jobs. Does it mean they are still “designers”. No. it means that the world is changing and half the industry does not know what to do.

oh well.

will china have a sense of design?

I think it is in everyone’s debate about product style and form language that is “chinese”. It took great time for the japanese to develop their distinctive style. And you can say that the Koreans are creating their own style. I will have an opinion that Korean style is still developing and not as distinctive as the japanese.

As for Chinese, it is a very long road for them. Below i copy/paste from the designboom.com and it is this type of politics that informs me that China will not have their cutting edge style anytime soon. For design to bloom, so must the artist communities.

Contemporary Artist are very organic and very creative. Design gets inspired from their “older” brother, the fine art. Fine Art is visual way to interpret the world. For artists in china and especially in beijing being destroyed by the government will not help designers to feel they are safe and welcome for innovative ideas.

I think it is wrong to say that china’s design style is coming along. I think hong kong and shanghai has design styles but those are “cities” not the over all country. There is a new york city style against a chicago style against Atlanta style, but the USA still overall has an American design style.

Personally me, when will china expect their own deep old culture and modernize it to their interpretation? When will they remove data from their business and embrace human emotions/intuition into their organizations? When will they stop “COPYING” every other products, cultures, styles, and think about the Chinese needs/interest/culture?

———–


from left, liu wei, liu yi, wu yuren, zhang jun and sun yuan are among the artists protesting the demolition of their homes and studios
in the northern part of beijing.

image © du bin

earlier this week nearly two dozen artists protested through china’s capital after forced
demolitions of their homes and studios in beijing’s artists’ villages gallery, police forces
intervened with swinging iron rods preventing the group to reach tiananmen square.


first hall, the artists’ villages gallery

the artists’ villages gallery is one of the largest art spaces in beijing with at more than
4,000 square meters. located in songzhuang in the capital’s eastern suburbs, it houses
more than 2000 contemporary chinese artists residents consisting of painters, sculptors,
calligraphers and photographers.


‘big pharmacy’, mixed media installation, september 2003
wuyuren, a photographer and installation artist was one of many attacked for protesting.

wy yu ren, a photographer and installation artist was one of many attacked by masked men
for protesting.


‘big pharmacy’, mixed media installation, september 2003


‘kui hua zi’ by ai weiwei, porcelain 1000kg

chinese contemporary artist ai weiwei sent out twitter messages to document the march
towards tiananmen square. police intervened within 500 yards of his march.


‘17 stools from the quing dynasty (1644-1911)’, 167cm x 180cm x 157cm by ai weiwei

residence artists are aggrieved by the situation as they were lured to the villages with
long term lease, in some cases for 20 years. for many, they have invested their life
saving in renovations and are concerned by the bullying tactics from developers.

the conflict over the future of beijing’s artist village is a direct result of increasing real
estate values and issues over land expropriation. this has prompted about suicides amongst
many of those faced with eviction followed by extensive media coverage. only now has
the government began considering the modification of the nation’s urban redevelopment
regulation.

however, for the protesters who have publicly vocalized their stance on the ongoing issue,
it is unclear whether their actions will alter the fate of the development threatening
the artists’ villages. read more here

chinese artists protest.

nex – us?

okay. I will admit i like where google is heading but also don’t like it. google is a double edge sword which consumers need to fully and completely become aware how powerful they can become in terms of the information world.

And i do realize that i really don’t keep up with my postings… why? cause i am a lunatic at my job. I love it but also it loves me… too much.

CMF! CMF! what the heck? in the little bit of the video i was utterly annoyed to say that CMF is everything to the phone – color, material, finish.

I will say that HTC did give this phone correctly,  in terms of the material and finish. The color? well it is interesting. In the daylight it is purple and the indoor it is tan-brown. I do agree that it is very natural like a ROCK! literally the phone is a river rock. I will agree there are tons of colorful rocks out there.

finish – yes the finish is wonderful but what else is new? it does not surprise me that finish is a matte, softtouch feel, just like the HTC eris…

So back to CMF! nothing is new and saying that cmf is very important, that is an underline statement because like the video says people want a bigger screen. UX design is highly important and it is not stated in the video, so in my opinion they realize their android software does not fit with the user’s experience.

I will agree, in terms of user experience i prefer the motorola blur or the HTC modify software versions.

Will google allow the different companies to modify and customize experiences of their android? I doubt it.

Is that the direction of smartphone? yes.

Will it overcome the apple iphone? doubt it.

Why? cause the market is still too unpredictable, since the android software changes like every 6 months. Think about, why would LG, samsung, htc, motorola, or sony erisson want to waste time after time making customized software bundles with android and then having to redo it for newer versions? that does not help with profits.  It is very funny. catch-22!

Keepon in Seoul

OKAY, at CES i met up with Keepon. truely my personal highlight. I will admit that the television screens are pretty insane but nothing else was too surprising

 

via YouTube – Keepon Goes Seoul-Searching.

Avatar + Pocahontas

 

 

 

As a child I love reading sci-fi novels and mostly love to watch sci-fi movies/tv dramas to see what other people are thinking about future design.

And i will admit, there are a lot of sci-fiction movies that have very basic plotlines and if you read any of Joseph Campbell’s books like power of myth. There is a common theme to all sci-fi – man verses society, man verses nature, man verses technology…….

i mean the leader of the pack of all movies would be the original star wars cause it is a very simple plotline of man verses society, man verse himself, man verses man (father), but what kills me about avatar is that the story is so SO similar to pocahontas!!!!!!!

first watch a new world or disney’s pocahontas. and then watch avatar! the same plotline. Adam smith is lost in the wilds of america, pocahontas finds him and then had to train her ways on him by her father the chief, then Adam returns to tell their ways, but his people wants gold, They want to find their village and distroy it. etc etc etc……

what also kills me is the similars in voices and such to native american design and culture. Note: there is also  influence to african culture too, but i am so sure that the chief is a native american voice over….

for positive note: I love the visualization and imagination of the movie. so no hard feeling for those that loves avatar. I loved it too.

but also this guy as a point about white society or I say western society:

I already know how the Noble Savage works as a pivot point for wrangling my emotions in a film’s narrative round-up. Or — *gasp* — the white man’s burden. To work that angle is tiring as a critique, however topical it might be. To critique it over and over again. And again.

*Sigh* “

read more about what he has to say:

via Near Future Laboratory » Blog Archive » Avatar On Its Face.

Rules we must follow for technology design

one thing i regret as a child is not reading arthur C. Clark. (I think it was because i rebel against everyone in my family as a child… since both my brothers have read them, why must I?)

Anyway, this was a unique point by him, and really is making want to read is books to see the reflection of technology he was envisioning and what we have developed today. It is indeed scary that he is on the same path of metaphors and ideas that we are performing today.

I personally feel we must believe in these rules or at least understand them in their context. Reason is, because I personally feel there are no rules in the world of technology innovations look at the segway! It does not fit a purpose to market today, but I feel it is an invention to do for future inventions, which is called evolution….

This is something i think most engineers and designers DON’T get, we have to produce products so it evolves into key critical ideas that changes society. for a second just stop thinking about the project you are working on as the end all be all solutions, because if we actually did make products that are SO PERFECT, then we no longer have jobs! we become unemployed.

I will agree you have to give you best on the project. Or otherwise we did not learn anything about that project for future project’s success rates.

______________________

 

Arthur C. Clarke, the science fiction writer, identified what he called the “three laws of prediction,” reflecting an optimistic view of ingenuity:

1. When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong;

2. The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture past them into the impossible; and

3. Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

Clarke was an exception to the rule that predicting future technology is hard. In Wireless World magazine in 1945, he proposed using a set of satellites in geostationary orbit to form a global communications network.

 

In “The View from Serendip,” published in 1977, Clarke predicted the Internet: “Immediate access in the home via simple computer-type keyboards, and TV displays, to all the world’s great libraries . . . And items needed for permanent reference could be printed off as soon as located on a copying machine—or filed magnetically in the home storage system.”

In the same book, he also forecast email and online news: “Facsimile services whereby letters, printed matter, etc. can be reproduced instantly. The physical delivery of mail and newspapers will thus be largely replaced by the orbital post office, and the orbital newspaper . . .”

 

 

via Gordon Crovitz: Technology Predictions Are Mostly Bunk – WSJ.com.

business card concept

i love the humor.

via Megan Cummins Works » Branding.

The Land Glider

Perhaps the most interesting bit Nissan pioneered with the Land Glider is the ability to lean into turns like a motorcycle. While this isn’t an entirely new concept, it’s a first for Nissan and the technology seems to be very well implemented in the Land Glider.’
- Autoblog.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

via a+.29: Nissan Land Glider.